|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| CAMPUS
IMPROVEMENT PLAN |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise
Elementary School |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| October 15,
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Teacher Creed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| We are leaders. We are mentors. We are models. We believe we are
capable and dependable teachers full of possibilities and potential. There is
no limit to what we can achieve. We believe education is the ticket to
success. We have Great Expectations for our students, ourselves, and our
district. We will teach for success. We will empower each child to do their
best without threat or fear of failure. We will create an atmosphere of
acceptance, caring, security, and learning. We will strive to instill the
Life Principles and Expectation for Living into the lives of students,
teachers, and parents of Paradise Elementary. Together WE CAN!!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Student Creed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I pledge today to do my best in Reading, Math, and all the rest.
I promise to obey the rules in my class and in the school. I'll respect
myself and others, too. I'll expect the best in all I do. I am here to learn
all I can, to try my best, and be all I am. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nondiscrimination
Notice |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise ISD does not discriminate on the basis of race,
religion, color, national origin, sex, or disability in providing education
services, activities, and programs, including vocational programs, in
accordance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Title
IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972; and Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Campus
Decision-Making Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stacie Meadows |
Chairman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mark Mathis |
Asst. Chairman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin Garrett |
Counselor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jennifer Crawford |
Special Education Teacher |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melissa Adair |
Teacher |
2nd Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deidre Ferguson |
Teacher |
2nd Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carla Gentry |
Teacher |
2nd Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheryl LaFreniere |
Teacher |
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melinda Mitchell |
Paraprofessional |
2nd Year |
|
2nd Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bethy Tierce |
|
|
Special Programs |
|
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holly Berry |
Special Programs |
2nd Year |
|
2nd Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robin Meadows |
Parent Representative |
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vann Wakefield |
|
Parent Representative |
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eva Read |
Business Representative |
2nd Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Melanie Tittor |
|
|
Business Representative |
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denise Oates |
Community Representative |
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chrissi Shields |
|
Community Representative |
1st Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District
Site-Base Committee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carla Gentry |
|
|
Teacher |
|
2nd Year |
|
1st Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cheryl LaFreniere |
|
Teacher |
|
1st Year |
|
2nd Term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GOAL I: Increase Student Achievement on all standard measures to
achieve exemplary status-(90%). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Math |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● All
students will improve from 92% passing in 2009 to 100% passing in the year
2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● African
American students will improve from 0% passing in the year 2009 to 100%
passing in 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Hispanic
students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Native
American students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Economically Disadvantaged students will improve from 81% passing in 2009 to
100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● White
students will improve from 92% passing in 2009 to 100% passing in the year
2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Special
Education students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● At-risk
students will improve from 83% passing in 2009 to 100% passing in the year
2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● All
students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● African
American students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Hispanic
students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Native
American students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Economically Disadvantaged students will maintain 100% passing in the year
2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● White
students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Special
Education students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● At-risk
students will maintain 100% passing in the year 2010. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THIRD GRADE TAKS RESULTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reading |
Math |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spring 2007 |
* |
Spring 2009 |
Spring 2007 |
Spring 2008 |
Spring 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
Tested % |
# Tested % |
# Tested % |
# Tested % |
# Tested % |
# Tested % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Students |
60 93/100 |
70 94/99 |
81 99/100 |
62 95 |
68 92 |
83 92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
African American |
1 100 |
---- ---- |
1 100 |
1 100 |
--- --- |
1 0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Native American |
2 50/100 |
2
---- |
2 100 |
2 100 |
2 ---- |
2 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hispanic |
6 100 |
5
80/100 |
9 100 |
6 100 |
5 80 |
9 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
White |
51 94/100 |
72 93/99 |
69 99 |
53 94 |
67 94 |
65 92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economically
Disadvantaged |
20 90/100 |
23
86/100 |
22 95/100 |
19 89 |
22 91 |
27 81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At Risk |
18 78/100 |
45 86/99 |
34 97/100 |
20 85 |
39 82 |
35 83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special Education |
14 100 |
9
89/100 |
5 100 |
11 100 |
10 90 |
4 100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Male |
31 90/100 |
41 93/99 |
41 100 |
33 97 |
40 98 |
41 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Female |
29 97/100 |
29
97/100 |
40 98/100 |
29 93 |
28 79 |
42 88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Executive Summary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Strengths: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● In TAKS
Reading, at-risk students improved from 86% to 97% on the first
administration. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Increased Reading comprehension PK-3 through the use of the Comprehension
Toolkits. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Thinking maps incorporated cross curricular in PK-3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Read
Naturally & MTS increased phonics skills, comprehension, and fluency in
Title pull-out programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● MTA
program in dyslexia improved reading skills for identified students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● G/T
coordinator worked with individual teachers for student programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Counseling to include individuals and small groups to help with violence
prevention, bullying, and grief/divorce counseling. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Increase in parent involvement through the PRIDE program and special program
night during Open House. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Visitor
sign in policy due to safety audit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Needs Assessment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Staff analyzed data from District TAKS scores, Campus TAKS Reading and Math
scores, Stanford Achievement Scores,
TPRI, and EMDA scores. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
In TAKS Math, increase economically disadvantaged students from 81% to 100%. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Concerns in Reading: TAKS Objective 1
- Basic understanding (86%) & TAKS Objective 2 - Applying Knowledge of
Literacy Elements (90%); transferring phonological skills while decoding and
comprehending texts; handwriting and basic sentence construction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Concerns in Math: Mathematical
Processes and Tools (72%), Numbers, Operations, and Quantitative Reasoning
(80%), & Concepts and Uses of Measurement (83%); basic Mathematical
Procedures and Computation (K-2). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●
Concerns in Science: Incorporate more
hands-on science experiments and activities to learn
vocabulary and terms. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
●Upgrade
intercom system and install pass code system for security doors. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| I. Increase
Student Achievement on All Standard Measures to Maintain Exemplary Status.
(90% or higher) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 1- |
Provide
appropriate instruction to meet the needs of all students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 2- |
Identify and
Target Subgroups. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 3- |
Implementation of
programs and strategies to enhance instruction. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 4- |
Securing
additional staff to meet student performance standards, and the documentation
required. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| II.
Communicate Effectively with parents and community. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 1- |
Encourage
parent and community involvement in the educational process while keeping the
public informed of school activities and achievements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| III. Provide a
Safe and Positive Learning Environment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 1- |
Gain
knowledge essential for making legal, safe, and healthy decisions about
tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs, and violence. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 2- |
Preparation of
staff and students in the event of a crisis situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 3- |
Continue projects
to improve the aesthetics of campus grounds. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| IV.
Improvement of Application and Integration of Technology into Teaching and
Learning. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 1- |
To implement TEKS
Technology Applications in K-3, and follow up on student skills check sheet. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
● Objective 2- |
Staff
will acquire technology skills through competencies to increase integration
of technology into the classroom curriculum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key for School wide Components |
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School wide Component 1—Conduct a
comprehensive needs assessment in order to design and implement a
successful campus plan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 2—Implement school wide reform strategies
that are scientifically research based. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 3—Provide instruction by highly qualified
staff. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 4—Provide high quality, on-going
professional development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 5—Provide strategies to attract highly
qualified teachers to high need students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 6—Utilize strategies to increase parental
involvement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 7—Ensure smooth transition for students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 8—Include teachers in decisions regarding
the use of assessments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
School wide Component 9—Implement a plan to
ensure that ALL students master the state’s challenging state
achievement standards and state academic assessments. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| School wide Component 10—Coordinate and integrate federal,
state, and local services and programs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise Elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Campus Improvement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District Goal 1: |
Increase Student Achievement on all standard
measures to maintain exemplary status.
(90% or higher) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Objective 1: |
Provide appropriate instruction to meet the
needs of all students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Summative Evaluation: |
TAKS results &
Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SW COMP |
Action(s) |
Needs
Assessment Comp. |
Sp. Pop. |
Person(s)
Responsible |
Timeline Start/End |
Resources
Human/Material/Fiscal |
Formative
Evaluation |
Documented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
TAKS
objectives taught in all subjects for all student populations (White,
Hispanic, African American, Special Ed, LEP, Economically Disadvantaged) |
AEIS
Report Cards
TAKS benchmark results
|
|
Classroom,
Music, and PE Teachers |
Evaluate
every 6 weeks Maintain |
Title 266 Reading $7500, General 199 - Math
$7500, Science $3000 |
TAKS
benchmark results, Lesson Plans, Report Cards |
TAKS
results, Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7,8 |
Grade
level and vertical meetings to discuss Core Maps in ELA, Science, SS, Math,
Technology, Fine Arts, and Electives. |
AEIS
Teacher input
|
|
Asst. Sup., Principal, Asst. Principal, Task Force Members |
Evaluate
every 6 weeks Maintain |
Fund 283-$1350.00 |
Progress Reports, Lesson Plans, Report Cards, Tech Path Maps |
TAKS Results, Report Cards, Tech Path Maps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 7,8 |
Provide
professional development for teachers to select/develop assessments for Core
Maps PK-3 in each core subject area. |
AEIS
Teacher input SBDM minutes
|
|
Asst. Sup., Principal, Asst. Principal, Task Force Members |
Aug 2010
New |
District
Budget |
Progress Reports, Lesson Plans, Report Cards, Tech Path Maps |
TAKS Results, Report Cards, Tech Path Maps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 10 |
Students
in 2nd and 3rd grades will be given the opportunity to participate in various
academic enrichment competitions through the University Interscholastic
League. Practices will begin in Sept. to increase student participation. |
Student Interest |
|
U.I.L Sponsors, Campus U.I.L. Director, Principal, Asst.
Principal |
Sept.-Dec. Maintain |
District
U.I.L. Funds |
|
Students are able to successfully compete with other students in
our U.I.L. district. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1,2,3,4 |
Thinking
Maps Write from the Beginning |
SBDM Meetings Staff Meetings |
|
Carla Gentry, SBDM Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug & Oct 2009
New |
Fund
211--Preparation $230.75, Stipend $800.00, Subs - $300.00 Training Fee
$700.00, Manuals $3145.00 - Total -
5175.75 |
Increase LA & Writing Skills |
Thinking Maps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2.4,9,10 |
Enterprise
Training |
SBDM
Meetings Staff Meetings |
|
SBDM
Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug 2009
New |
Fund
283 - $8035.48 |
Improve
Student Reading Practice, Voc., Recorded Voice, & Literary Skills |
Parent
Involvement, RTI, Benchmarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,4,9,10 |
CAST
Conference (Science) |
Lead
Teachers, Admin Meetings, Curriculum Mapping |
K-3 |
Teachers,
Principal, Assistant Principal |
Nov 2009
New |
TEKS,
Science Professional Development - $1,450 |
Science
Professional Development, TEKS aligned |
Lesson
Plans aligned with TEKS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key: AEIS-Academic Excellence Indicator System, CAT-Campus Assistance Team, ED-Economically
disadvantaged, EMDA-Early Math Diagnostic Assessment, ESL-English as a Second
Language, GE-Great
Expectations, G/T-Gifted
and Talented, HQ-Highly
Qualified, LAT-Linguistically
Accommodated Test, LEP-Limited English Proficient, RtI-Response to Intervention, SBDM-Site Base Decision Making, Assessment
System, Stanford-Stanford Achievement Test, TELPAS-Texas English
Language Proficiency Assessment System, TOP-Texas Observation Protocol, TPRI-Texas Primary Reading Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Timeline Key: New-New Action, Maintain-Maintained Action, Future-Future Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise Elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Campus Improvement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District Goal 1: |
Increase Student Achievement on all standard
measures to maintain exemplary status.
(90% or higher) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Objective 1: |
Provide appropriate instruction to meet the
needs of all students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Summative Evaluation: |
TAKS results &
Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SW COMP |
Action(s) |
Needs
Assessment Comp. |
Sp. Pop. |
Person(s)
Responsible |
Timeline Start/End |
Resources
Human/Material/Fiscal |
Formative
Evaluation |
Documented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
CAMT
Workshop |
Lead
Teachers, Admin Meetings, Curriculum Mapping |
K-3 |
Teachers,
Principal, Assistant Principal |
Summer
2010
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $1575.00 |
Research
Based Technology, Training, & Curricular Materials |
Hands-on
Activities, Lesson Plans aligned with TEKS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Frog
Street Press |
Lead
Teachers, Admin Meetings, Curriculum Mapping |
|
Teachers,
Principal, Assistant Principal |
Sept 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $499.99 |
PK Progress Reports |
Small
Groups, Build Vocab and Develop Sequential Instruction for PK Guidelines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Guided
Reading Books & Extra Texts |
SBDM
Meetings Staff Meetings |
K-3, Title Reading |
SBDM
Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug. 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 |
Implement Voc. & Fluency Exercises in Small Groups |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TAKS Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Easel
Pads PK-3 |
SBDM
Meetings Staff Meetings |
K-3, Title Reading |
SBDM
Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug. 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $517.72 |
Increase Writing Skills and Critical Thinking using Thinking
Maps |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TAKS Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
K
Big Books-- Predictable Texts |
SBDM
Meetings Staff Meetings |
K, Title Reading |
SBDM
Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug. 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $1617.00 |
Use Comprehension Strategies & Shared Reading to Increase
Skills |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TAKS Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Reading
with Meaning |
SBDM
Meetings Staff Meetings |
PK-3, Title Reading |
SBDM
Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug. 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $104.20 |
Strategies to Assist with Inferring, Making Connections, &
Creating Mental Images |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TAKS Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Primary
Toolkits & Comprehensive Toolkits with extra texts K-3 |
SBDM
Meetings Staff Meetings |
K-3, Title Reading |
SBDM
Members, Classroom Teachers, Special Programs |
Aug. 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $7440.00 |
Strategies to Assist with Inferring, Making Connections, &
Creating Mental Images |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TAKS Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Literacy
Stations Workshop by Debbie Dillard |
Reading
Specialist, Lead Teachers, Principal |
K-3 |
Special
Programs, Lead Teachers, Principal, Assistant Principal |
Oct 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $1096.00 |
Create Literacy Work Centers for Small Group Instruction |
Literacy Work Centers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Literacy
Conference |
Reading
Specialist, Lead Teachers, Principal, SBDM minutes |
K-3 |
Special
Programs, Lead Teachers, Principal, Assistant Principal |
July 2009
New |
Title
I ARRA Fund 285 - $5625.00 |
Increase Reading Skills Using the Toolkits and Literacy Stations |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TAKS Scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key: AEIS-Academic Excellence Indicator System, CAT-Campus Assistance Team, ED-Economically
disadvantaged, EMDA-Early Math Diagnostic Assessment, ESL-English as a Second
Language, GE-Great
Expectations, G/T-Gifted
and Talented, HQ-Highly
Qualified, LAT-Linguistically
Accommodated Test, LEP-Limited English Proficient, RtI-Response to Intervention, SBDM-Site Base Decision Making, Assessment
System, Stanford-Stanford Achievement Test, TELPAS-Texas English
Language Proficiency Assessment System, TOP-Texas Observation Protocol, TPRI-Texas Primary Reading Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Timeline Key: New-New Action, Maintain-Maintained Action, Future-Future Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise Elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Campus Improvement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District Goal 1: |
Increase Student Achievement on all standard
measures to maintain exemplary status.
(90% or higher) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Objective 1: |
Provide appropriate instruction to meet the
needs of all students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Summative Evaluation: |
TAKS results &
Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SW COMP |
Action(s) |
Needs
Assessment Comp. |
Sp. Pop. |
Person(s)
Responsible |
Timeline Start/End |
Resources
Human/Material/Fiscal |
Formative
Evaluation |
Documented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase math manipulatives and games in PK to
help with items assessed in PK progress report. |
PK Progress
Reports, K Screening,
K Report Cards |
PK |
PK
teacher, Principal, Asst. Principal |
Jan -
2010
New |
Instructional Budget - Math $7500 |
PK
Progress Report, Teacher Input |
PK Progress
Reports, K Screening,
K Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Utilize Saxon Phonics in PK to vertically align
with K-3. |
PK Progress
Reports, K Screening,
K Report Cards |
PK |
PK
teacher, Principal, Asst. Principal |
Aug
2009
New |
Fund 266 Reading Materials--$7500 |
PK
Progress Report, Teacher Input |
PK Progress
Reports, K Screening,
K Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,5 |
Use Frog Street Press Step Up Literacy Program
to help build vocabulary and develop emergent literacy skills in PK. The program provides for frequent
opportunities for review and assessment. |
PK Progress Reports, K Screening,
K Report Cards |
LEP, ESL |
PK teacher, Principal, Asst. Principal |
Aug
2009
New |
Title I ARRA Fund 285 - $499.99 |
Lesson Plans, Teacher input |
PK progress reports, K screening; TELPAS scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Improve writing skills through the use of the
Writer's Workshop and ideas from Jessica Meacham and Matt Glover. Improve segmenting and blending sounds,
storytelling skills, and incorporate higher level questioning for
inferencing. |
Stanford
scores; TPRI scores; Teacher input |
|
Kindergarten
teachers |
Dec. 2009
New |
Fund
266 Reading Materials--$7500 |
Lesson
Plans, Stanford Scores, TPRI, Principal
& Asst. Principal Walk-throughs |
Stanford
Scores, Report Cards, TPRI results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase
listening skills by incorporating activities and lessons from The Colors & Shapes of Language by Neuhaus Education Center. |
Stanford Scores; Teacher input; TPRI scores |
|
Kindergarten teachers |
Oct 2009
New |
Fund
266 Reading Materials--$7500 |
Lesson Plans, Stanford Scores, TPRI scores, Principal & Asst. Principal Walk-throughs |
Stanford Scores, Report Cards, TPRI results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase
sentence and word reading skills through the use of Writer's Workshop and the
morning message. Students will be
given the opportunity to practice with multiple sentences and weekly poems to
increase fluency. |
Stanford
Scores, Teacher input |
|
1st grade
teachers |
Dec.
2009
New |
Fund
266 Reading Materials--$7500 |
Lesson
Plans &Stanford Scores |
Stanford
Scores & TPRI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase fluency in math computation and
continue problem solving skills through enVision Math program and
supplements. |
Stanford
Scores |
|
1st grade
teachers |
Aug 2009
New |
Instructional Supply Budget--Math $7500 |
Lesson
Plans & Stanford Scores |
Stanford Scores & EMDA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase
mathematical procedures though the use
of Excel and strategies from Sharon Wells. |
TAKS Scores, Stanford Scores, 110% Comp Report |
|
2nd Grade Teachers |
Aug
2009
New |
Instructional Supply Budget--Math $7500 |
Lesson Plans, EMDA, Stanford scores |
Stanford
Scores, EMDA results, & TAKS scores |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key: AEIS-Academic Excellence Indicator System, CAT-Campus Assistance Team, ED-Economically
disadvantaged, EMDA-Early Math Diagnostic Assessment, ESL-English as a Second
Language, GE-Great
Expectations, G/T-Gifted
and Talented, HQ-Highly
Qualified, LAT-Linguistically
Accommodated Test, LEP-Limited English Proficient, RtI-Response to Intervention, SBDM-Site Base Decision Making, Assessment
System, Stanford-Stanford Achievement Test, TELPAS-Texas English
Language Proficiency Assessment System, TOP-Texas Observation Protocol, TPRI-Texas Primary Reading Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Timeline Key: New-New Action, Maintain-Maintained Action, Future-Future Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise Elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Campus Improvement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District Goal 1: |
Increase Student Achievement on all standard
measures to maintain exemplary status.
(90% or higher) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Objective 1: |
Provide appropriate instruction to meet the
needs of all students. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Summative Evaluation: |
TAKS results &
Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SW COMP |
Action(s) |
Needs Assessment Comp. |
Sp. Pop. |
Person(s) Responsible |
Timeline Start/End |
Resources
Human/Material/Fiscal |
Formative Evaluation |
Documented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Incorporate
guided reading with leveled books and Enterprise Reading to increase
vocabulary and fluency. Teachers will
visit with students in small groups to teach vocabulary concepts. |
Stanford
Scores, Teacher Input |
|
2nd grade
teachers |
Aug.
2009
New |
Instructional
Supply Budget; Enterprise ($24,106.44 IDEA B ARRA) |
Lesson
Plans, Stanford Scores, TPRI scores, Principal & Asst. Principal Walk-throughs |
Stanford
Scores, TPRI scores, Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Target
TAKS Objectives 1 & 2 to improve skills in prefixes, suffixes,
vocabulary, and summarizing.
Curriculum and strategies used will include: Frayer Model for Vocabulary Building,
Challenge words in Spelling, Saxon Phonics, Kamico Games, and Enterprise
Reading. |
TAKS
benchmark results & TAKS results, Teacher Input |
|
3rd grade
teachers |
Evaluate
every 6 weeks Maintain |
Fund 266 Reading Materials--$7500 |
Lesson
Plans, TAKS benchmark results, Principal
& Asst. Principal Walk-throughs |
TAKS
Results |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase
Mathematical Processes and Tools (72%) and Numbers, Operations and
Quantitative Reasoning (80%), and Uses of Measurement (83%) by supplementing
with Countdown to Math TAKS, Mentoring Minds of Voc. Adventure, Cheryl Cox
Math, and Kamico Software. |
TEKS, TAKS benchmark & TAKS results, Teacher input |
|
3rd grade teachers |
Evaluate
every 6 weeks Maintain |
Instructional Supply Budget--Math $7500 |
Lesson Plans, TAKS benchmark results, Principal & Asst. Principal Walk-throughs, AR
reports |
TAKS Results, AR Reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
Increase
hands on lessons in Science through the incorporation of a science
investigation center with microscopes, flashlights, magnet discovery board,
and discovery pocket charts. CEI
Science Voc. Program for grade 3. |
TAKS Scores, Teacher Input, cross-grade level team meetings |
|
K-3 Classroom Teachers, Principal, Asst. Principal |
Evaluate
every 6 weeks Maintain |
Fund
199-Supplies for Science ($3000); Fund 285 - $1665.00 |
Report Cards, Teacher Input, TAKS benchmark scores |
District TAKS scores, Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2,8,9 |
PK
students instructed by a Highly Qualified teacher using PK guidelines. PK teacher communicates regularly with K
teachers to help in transition. |
PK Progress reports, K Screening, K Report Cards |
PK |
PK Teacher, Principal, Assistant Principal |
Evaluate
every 6 weeks Maintain |
District
Budget |
PK Progress Reports, Teacher Input |
PK Progress reports, K Screening, K Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Key: AEIS-Academic Excellence Indicator System, CAT-Campus Assistance Team, ED-Economically
disadvantaged, EMDA-Early Math Diagnostic Assessment, ESL-English as a Second
Language, GE-Great
Expectations, G/T-Gifted
and Talented, HQ-Highly
Qualified, LAT-Linguistically
Accommodated Test, LEP-Limited English Proficient, RtI-Response to Intervention, SBDM-Site Base Decision Making, Assessment
System, Stanford-Stanford Achievement Test, TELPAS-Texas English
Language Proficiency Assessment System, TOP-Texas Observation Protocol, TPRI-Texas Primary Reading Inventory |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Timeline Key: New-New Action, Maintain-Maintained Action, Future-Future Action |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Paradise Elementary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Campus Improvement Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2009-2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| District Goal 1: |
Increase Student Achievement on all standard
measures to maintain exemplary status.
(90% or higher) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Performance Objective 2: |
Identify and
target all Subgroups |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Summative Evaluation: |
TAKS results, Stanford
scores, TELPAS results, & Report Cards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| SW COMP |
Action(s) |
Needs
Assessment Comp. |
Sp. Pop. |
Person(s)
Responsible |
Timeline Start/End |
Resources
Human/Material/Fiscal |
Formative
Evaluation |
Documented |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 4,5 |
English
as a Second Language (ESL) instruction for
students identified by state criteria. ESL teachers will be provided
with updates. Encourage classroom
teachers to obtain ESL certification to ensure that each grade level has at
least two certified teachers. |
AEIS, Home
Language Surveys |
LEP, ESL |
ESL
Certified Classroom Teachers
Counselor
Principal,
Asst. Principal |
1 hour daily
by classroom teacher during LA time
Maintain |
ESL
Budget (25), Fees and Dues-$250.00, Supplies-$500, Salaries - $4804.10 |
Lesson
Plans, Teacher input, Current list of teachers certified in ESL |
TELPAS
scores, increase ESL certified teachers to
at least two per grade level. Copy of Teachers' Certification upon
completion. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|